Facility condition index: Facility Condition Index
The median published figure in the Facility Condition Index is 25 percent across 2 sources' own pages (range 10 to 40 percent), read 12 October 2026.
Cafmlane sells its own paid plan in this category (our pricing). It is not counted here: every figure in this index is another provider's own published price, read from its own page.
2 of the 16 named sources read in full publish a figure; 14 publish none, read 12 October 2026.
The median is unchanged since 26 September 2026 (was 25 percent across 2).
By estate
| Breakdown | Median | Range | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| estateUniversity of Missouri, buildings over 0.40 FCNI | 40% | 40 to 40% | 1 |
| estateGSA federal inventory, FY2022 | 10% | 10 to 10% | 1 |
Every figure, with its source
One row per source: the figure the source's own page publishes, the page, and the day it was read. A figure that is not on a page we read is not on this one.
| Source | Figure | Breakdown | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Missouri facility condition needs index | 40% | University of Missouri, buildings over 0.40 FCNI | 2026-10-12 |
| GSA FY2022 agency financial report, required supplementary information | 10% | GSA federal inventory, FY2022 | 2026-10-12 |
The sentence each figure was read from (2)
- University of Missouri facility condition needs index, read 2026-10-12:
At Mizzou, there are 42 buildings with an FCNI of over .40, meaning 40 percent of the building is deficient.
- GSA FY2022 agency financial report, required supplementary information, read 2026-10-12:
inventory, according to square footage, is considered in “Good Condition,” with an FCI of 10 percent
Read in full, publishes no figure
14 named sources were read in full on the dates shown and print no usable figure. They are counted, never filled in.
- NASA NPR 8831.2F chapter 9 deferred maintenance, read 2026-09-11: every candidate on the page was refused
- GOV.UK Condition Data Collection 2 programme, read 2026-10-12: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- City of Tempe facilities condition index data catalog, read 2026-10-12: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- WBDG deferred maintenance and parametric estimating, read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- Minnesota enterprise real property facility condition assessment report, read 2026-09-12: every candidate on the page was refused
- DfE Condition of School Buildings Survey (CDC1) key findings, read 2026-09-12: every candidate on the page was refused
- Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board campus condition index workgroup report, read 2026-10-12: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- UBC understanding facility condition index, read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- US Department of Veterans Affairs facility condition assessment programme, read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- GSA real property reports, read 2026-10-12: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- OSD Installation Energy and Environment maintenance initiatives, read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- University of Virginia report on the condition of university facilities, read 2026-09-12: every candidate on the page was refused
- University of Colorado annual facility condition index scoring, read 2026-10-12: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- APPA on the facilities condition index, read 2026-09-12: every candidate on the page was refused
Methodology
Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).
2 of the 16 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 14 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 3 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.
The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in % (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 57 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.
The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): one row per reporting estate per year: the facility condition index as that estate publishes it (and which definition it uses - required renewal over replacement value, or a 0-100 score), the deferred-maintenance backlog behind it, and the replacement value it is divided by; the derivation is the cross-estate comparison and the series nobody publishes - the distribution of FCI across reporting public estates, the share in each condition band, and the year-on-year movement of the backlog
57 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.
Sources (19)
- NASA NPR 8831.2F chapter 9 deferred maintenance(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- GOV.UK Condition Data Collection 2 programme(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- City of Tempe facilities condition index data catalog(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- WBDG deferred maintenance and parametric estimating(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- NHS Estates Returns Information Collection 2024/25(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- Minnesota enterprise real property facility condition assessment report(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- Colorado Office of the State Architect facility condition audits(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- GSA FY2022 agency financial report, required supplementary information(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- CBO deferred maintenance backlog for military services' buildings(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- DfE Condition of School Buildings Survey (CDC1) key findings(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board campus condition index workgroup report(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- University of Missouri facility condition needs index(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- UBC understanding facility condition index(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- US Department of Veterans Affairs facility condition assessment programme(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- GSA real property reports(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- OSD Installation Energy and Environment maintenance initiatives(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- University of Virginia report on the condition of university facilities(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- University of Colorado annual facility condition index scoring(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- APPA on the facilities condition index(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
Cite or embed this figure
Cite or embed this figure
The median published figure in the Facility Condition Index is 25 percent across 2 sources' own pages (range 10 to 40 percent), read 12 October 2026.
2 of the 16 named sources read in full publish a figure; 14 publish none, read 12 October 2026.
Facility Condition Index, estate University of Missouri, buildings over 0.40 FCNI: median 40 percent across 1 source, read 12 October 2026.
Facility Condition Index, estate GSA federal inventory, FY2022: median 10 percent across 1 source, read 12 October 2026.
The median is unchanged since 26 September 2026 (was 25 percent across 2).
Cite as: "Cafmlane Facility Condition Index", updated 2026-10-18, https://cafmlane.com/datasets/facility-condition-index/.
Download the CSV (2 rows, computed 2026-10-18)